Big title for a little blog, but whatever.
In what we've read so far regarding Karl Marx, it seems like someone (or someones) later on in life took it upon themselves to exploit the theme set up in what we call 'Marxism' to benefit themselves while seeming like they were aiming for a goal to help the general public. What Marx proposed himself was faulty in the first place, since he disregarded the core of humanity and the true reasoning behind religion. But it certainly didn't have to build up into what we call 'Socialism' of today; someone could have contributed to his work in a better way, rather than a worse one, and perhaps have come up with a form of 'Socialism' that truly integrates society.
I already don't like the wording of this blog I'm writing, as I sound just like others in class and am using similar wording. But I suppose that just means I agree with them overall; Karl Marx -- 'Marxism', as a whole -- was at some point misunderstood, then constructed on top of to form something that destroyed the lives of so many for years and years afterward.
I think if someone had come along and incorporated the missing aspects in his viewpoint, something better (even if not by much) could have been formed than Capitalism or Socialism. Anyone agree?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment